minor edit for speaking purposes

This commit is contained in:
anon 2019-10-20 07:34:52 -04:00
parent a043f9b9ad
commit 4de3bdfdef

View File

@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
## i. Into the Machine
A common misconception of Debord's idea of the spectacle is that images are evil. Absolute statements like that really only belong in marxist ideology and dont really
do much for me or what I plan on saying. Images are tools and since their signifigance probably won't disappear it seems prudent for us flag waving radicals to use them. The
do much for me or what I plan on saying. Images are tools and since their signifigance probably won't disappear, it seems prudent for us flag waving radicals to use them. The
same power of image that can push a person to buy a truckload of shit they dont really want or need, could also be used to make them behead a politician. This delicate dance of iconography
is, in this anarchist's humble opinion, best reflected in the Cyberpunk movement. Ignoring the fact that a horde of fuarking people that are cringing at my use of the word
is, in this anarchist's humble opinion, best reflected in the Cyberpunk movement. Ignoring the fact that a horde of fuarking people are probably cringing at my use of the word
"movement", Cyberpunk has what many consider to a pretty damn good true-to-life take on the present and near future. Its motto: High Tech Low life, can be seen in the massive
catalog of media its inspired. When this motto is expanded, one can see that Cyberpunk orbits around juxtaposition of seemingly god-like technology and its effect on
the people who are controlled and atomized by it. Stop me if that sounded familiar. That idea was cemented in the Cyberpunk canon by Gibson's Neuromancer and brought to